|
Post by rebsrep on Apr 22, 2016 7:59:33 GMT
What do you mean by "again". I'm personally not aware of an instance it's been completely offline before (though I haven't checked the logs). There has been the odd bad link in the past i.e. one or 2 pages down, but the whole site is extremely rare and our team are working to restore service asap.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,919
|
Post by SteveT on Apr 22, 2016 8:10:09 GMT
What do you mean by "again". I'm personally not aware of an instance it's been completely offline before (though I haven't checked the logs). There has been the odd bad link in the past i.e. one or 2 pages down, but the whole site is extremely rare and our team are working to restore service asap. I assume the "again" relates to the top half of this thread concerning the outage over Easter (see p2pindependentforum.com/post/103635/thread)
|
|
brush
Member of DD Central
Posts: 172
Likes: 154
|
Post by brush on Apr 22, 2016 8:11:06 GMT
Try not even a month ago.
|
|
|
Post by rebsrep on Apr 22, 2016 8:22:05 GMT
Try not even a month ago. Fair enough. I was just making the point that "again" implies regular occurence to the casual reader, when in fact it's not. The website might be a little slow, but it's rarely down.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,919
|
Post by SteveT on Apr 22, 2016 8:33:52 GMT
Try not even a month ago. Fair enough. I was just making the point that "again" implies regular occurence to the casual reader, when in fact it's not. The website might be a little slow, but it's rarely down. I wouldn't take it personally; the equivalent FC "broken website" thread is into its 3rd generation and currently runs to 49 pages!
|
|
|
Post by danraj on Apr 22, 2016 9:00:08 GMT
All up & running again. Sorry about the temporary downtime there folks.
|
|
|
Post by rebsrep on Apr 22, 2016 9:44:21 GMT
Fair enough. I was just making the point that "again" implies regular occurence to the casual reader, when in fact it's not. The website might be a little slow, but it's rarely down. I wouldn't take it personally; the equivalent FC "broken website" thread is into its 3rd generation and currently runs to 49 pages! Thanks Steve.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Apr 22, 2016 19:30:40 GMT
And that's the second or third incarnation of the Faintly Comical Failed Website thread - I started a new one once, or maybe twice, when the old one threatened to get into three figures (of pages, not posts!!). Be time for a new new new one, except I've sort of given up on them...
|
|