fasty
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 388
|
Post by fasty on Dec 27, 2016 17:41:32 GMT
That's awkward for someone, isn't it?
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Dec 27, 2016 17:47:24 GMT
Break out the £50k loans...
|
|
|
Post by slumberingaccountant on Dec 28, 2016 10:14:48 GMT
I thought that following other years, the PM would be more of less zero leading to a boom in the SM. I think FC flooded the PM and shot themselves in both feet. I couldnt believe the number of loans that were listed 21-23 December.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Dec 28, 2016 11:42:54 GMT
30382 and 30444 withdrawn.
|
|
|
Post by slumberingaccountant on Dec 28, 2016 12:06:47 GMT
30382 and 30444 withdrawn. yes, money back in account. Along with 21855 repaid. FC need to improve bookkeeping. Deleting the transaction lines for those above is very poor practice.
|
|
jayjay
Member of DD Central
Posts: 264
Likes: 116
|
Post by jayjay on Dec 28, 2016 12:06:57 GMT
30382 and 30444 withdrawn. 30314 moved from 50% to fully funded in little more than half an hour.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Dec 28, 2016 12:53:54 GMT
Another half million gone this morning… but none of my bargain 'for sale at a premium with a whole 2 months left to run' offerings.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Dec 29, 2016 18:42:46 GMT
Another million down and the cupboard is bare. My pre-owned, one careful owner, never been raced ten percenters are flying off the shelf at a very satisfying premium.
|
|
mikeb
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 472
|
Post by mikeb on Jan 4, 2017 18:09:14 GMT
30382 and 30444 withdrawn. FC need to improve bookkeeping. Deleting the transaction lines for those above is very poor practice. I think you mean FC need to learn bookkeeping, if a mere slumberingaccountant can spot their poor practice It is standard practice on Planet FC to remove statement transactions for "Loan Offers" if the bid does NOT turn into a loan part. Has been since the days of actual auctions and bid/rebid/rebid cycle of trying to get a high bid in. You used to see it a lot more, back then. Now, almost all auctions you bid in turn into loans. The observation that a "loan offer" isn't really a statement-recordable-transaction has been made before. But FC are stuck with their systems set to "broken as designed".
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Jan 5, 2017 18:34:43 GMT
I think they only remove it from the transaction report digest that they offer up to customers**. The REAL transaction report is much larger and slightly more detailed (like it has two timestamps for transactions in many cases - bid at, and finalised at), and maybe they don't go deleting lines from that one. They still seem able to break an atomic transaction into two quarks, and then lose or duplicate one, though .. i.e. I can record the sale of a loan part, but the buyer never gets to buy it.
** the summarising process is what breaks when you have too many transactions, so you get told 'there were none' .. there were, but the extraction job couldn't complete in the allotted time.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Jan 5, 2017 21:00:46 GMT
They've lost the 'charm' quark completely.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,919
|
Post by SteveT on Feb 9, 2017 16:31:00 GMT
There's plenty of A+ Uxbridge at 10%. (This could become my new West Byfleet. ) Thanks for flagging that one. I've just made my first cash transfer back IN to Faintly Comical for about 15 months (the greener grass on t'other side of the fence looking rather patchy in places at the moment). It's starting to feel like we need to start an "A+ 10% alert" thread to replace the old E alerts... [Of course, I'm now an arch Diversity Criminal, with something approaching 99% exposure to a single loan ]
|
|
nick
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 825
|
Post by nick on Feb 9, 2017 17:25:55 GMT
Looks like they pulled the plug on the 2nd A+ 10% Uxbridge loan. Maybe they forgot that they have changed the risk categories and that it should have been rated a at B at 10%.....
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,919
|
Post by SteveT on Feb 9, 2017 17:31:00 GMT
Looks like they pulled the plug on the 2nd A+ 10% Uxbridge loan. Maybe they forgot that they have changed the risk categories and that it should have been rated a at B at 10%..... Curious. The 1st tranche (32365) looks to have completed OK as an A+ 10%. Perhaps the 2nd will reappear in due course...
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Feb 9, 2017 17:32:59 GMT
Looks like they pulled the plug on the 2nd A+ 10% Uxbridge loan. Maybe they forgot that they have changed the risk categories and that it should have been rated a at B at 10%..... That is sounding too close to the possible reason. I bought a lot of Uxbridge1 A+ yesterday, which is live, and our bids on Uxbridge2 have been rejected without explanation. I was so pleased to see this project. What have they done? Will they repay Uxbridge1? Will Uxbridge2 be relisted and go as a whole loan - after I sold stuff to put on it? Grrrr.
|
|